W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub!

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:38:23 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, ext Kai Hendry <hendry@aplix.co.jp>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0426B9CC-C189-4CE1-BD36-71AFB91ECA22@nokia.com>
To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
I was aware of what you quoted Marcos, but it was implicit. If it is  
ok, then I'm not sure why we've been having this email thread...

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On May 5, 2009, at 6:38 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Arthur Barstow  
> <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>> On May 4, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We can add, "A signer MUST place the dsp:Identifier signature  
>>> property
>>> into the signature when generating the signature." if necessary.
>>
>> This seems like a reasonable way to address Kai's question.
>
> that  is already in the spec:
>
> "Each widget signature MUST contain a dsp:Identifier signature
> properties element compliant with XML Signature Properties
> [XMLDSIG-Properties] and this specification."
>
>> Kai - please let us know if Frederick's proposal is acceptable.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 11:39:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT