Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> (Also I see that you’re using the “string” and “wstring”, and L"wide
> string" values.  Are you of the opinion that Web IDL should introduce
> those instead of DOMString?)

Shiki Okasaka <shiki@google.com> wrote:
> In my opinion, it would be nice if we can use the keyword 'string' as
> the same meaning of 'DOMString' in Web IDL since it's not only for DOM
> specifications.

this would be a serious problem for mozilla. In mozilla, 'string' and
'wstring' mean things very different from DOMString, and we can't
change that.

Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 08:36:06 UTC