W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [Selectors] Selectors to Proposed Rec - call for consensus

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:54:34 +0200
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.useks8biwxe0ny@widsith.local>
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:00:44 +0200, Anopti mist <chaals@opera.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> It would appear that the Selectors API is done...

or nearly so.

> Since the call for consensus to produce a Candidate Recommendation  
> following the Last Call and resolution of comments received, there has  
> been one substantive change to the document - removing [Null] and  
> [Undefined] extended attributes from IDL, added note about handling null  
> and undefined. It seems that there is general agreement that this change  
> does not materially impact the specification in practice, and we can  
> therefore request Proposed Recommendation.
...
> This is a call for consensus on the question:
>
> ... the group should request Proposed Recommendation status for the  
> Selectors API spec, based on the Editor's draft version 1.97[1]

This question did not receive sufficient support. We will therefore  
publish a Candidate Recommendation.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 00:55:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT