Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > I don't think this one point should be decisive by itself. But I don't > think it should be given zero weight either. Agreed (in case that wasn't clear). > Note that one of the clients in question is the offline-enabled mobile > version of GMail. I think this demonstrates that the SQL-based Database > Storage can serve the needs of an advanced and polished Web application. > In addition, we have a rough demonstration that it is practically > implementable in a modern Web engine. Both quite true. > One clear problem identified despite these examples is that we do not > have a precise enough spec for the query language to make truly > independent interoperable implementations possible. It seems to me that > significantly redesigning database storage is not necessary to address > this. Yes; the two issues are somewhat orthogonal, in my opinion. -BorisReceived on Friday, 10 April 2009 21:27:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT