W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Fwd: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:00:59 -0500
Message-Id: <C3E7CB58-EA0D-4571-9024-45201ABB42F1@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, tag@w3.org
To: Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com>
Stuart, All,

Given the group's last discussion on this subject [1], my expectation  
is we will continue to focus on our use case [as chartered] and our  
general plan remains the same as we discussed with TAG members on  
October 21 [2].  See [3] for a thread we had regarding that October  
21 discussion.

Regarding notifying the TAG when related test cases are available, I  
created an Action for that request [4] and will notify you when those  
test cases are available.

-Regards, Art Barstow

[1] <http://www.w3.org/2008/10/30-wam-minutes.html#item03>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12>
[3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/ 
[4] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/282>

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "ext Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
> Date: November 21, 2008 9:57:08 AM EST
> To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> Cc: "tag@w3.org" <tag@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www- 
> archive@w3.org>
> Subject: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.
> Art,
> [cc'd to www-archive@w3.org to enable public reference]
> I picked up an action [1] item from yesterdays TAG telcon to  
> respond that the TAG does not believe that it has the capacity to  
> solve the widget addressing problem within a 3 month timeframe as  
> mentioned/discussed when members of the TAG met with your WG [2].
> I think it would also be true to say (as I believe we aready have)  
> that the TAG is more interested in general solution to the problems  
> of refering into packaging structures (and maybe runtime 'objects'  
> instantiated from such structures) as opposed to addressing a  
> solution targetted soley on requirements for widget packaging/ 
> referencing.
> I don't know quite what 'balls' this leaves in what 'courts' right  
> now - it would be good to check expectations all round.
> The TAG also asks that that you notify us when relevant test cases  
> for URI based widget referencing become available.
> Thanks
> Stuart Williams
> (for W3C TAG)
> --
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/196
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12
> AB: where do we do follow up? www-tag?
> DanC: yes
> ... what's the time scale?
> MC: we want to finish this within 3 months.
> DanC: are there any test cases for this?
> MC: no
> ... we're starting an implementation now
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell,  
> Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
> [Tracker: this is TAG ACTION-196]
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2008 14:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:12 UTC