W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:13:10 +1100
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <20081122001309.GA13802@arc.mcc.id.au>

Lachlan Hunt:
> It seems from the Java bindings section of Web IDL that the way to  
> define modules and how they're mapped to Java packages isn't yet very  
> stable.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#java-modules

Right, it’s not stable yet.

> I'm hesitant to include the module declaration in the IDL at this stage.  
> Although I suppose I could and then just update it if WebIDL changes.  
> If I did so, is there anything else I would need to specify in the prose 
> for this?

Not in the prose, no.  The change would either be to the syntax of the
module definition or adding an extended attribute on it to specify the
mapping of module to Java package name.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2008 00:13:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:28 GMT