W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:58:25 +0100
Message-ID: <490B9BA1.7090800@lachy.id.au>
To: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
CC: public-webapps@w3.org

Stewart Brodie wrote:
> 1) What is the scope element for - it's only mentioned in one sentence?

That statement has now been commented out (see my previous mail [1])

> 2) Is an empty string actually a valid selector?  If not, then the whole
> "null/undefined is an empty string" discussion is irrelevant - it's simply a
> syntax error.

Selectors defines what's considered valid or invalid, and an empty 
string is invalid.  So having the spec say to treat null and undefined 
as empty strings is effectively an indirect way of saying it's a syntax 

> 3) Does the matching algorithm work on based on the entire tree that
> contains the context node or just the sub-tree rooted at the context node? I
> think this is easiest fixed by adding an example like the one in the
> previous e-mail that I'm quoting and stating the expected result:

Already added (see previous mail).

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0216.html

Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 23:59:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:12 UTC