W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:59:58 -0700
To: arun@mozilla.com
Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Message-id: <69415116-932B-43B0-8DB0-50A3C73D7B9A@apple.com>


On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:

> All,
>
> Maceij wrote:
>>>
>>>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapps/2008OctDec/0010.html
>>>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0047.html
>>>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0186.html
>>>> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0387.html
>>>
>>> Were you referring to [3] above? I didn't actually realize that  
>>> Apple
>>> was proposing that as a v1 for the FileUpload spec. Apologies for
>>> that, it was certainly not intended to be ignored.
>>
>> Yes, [3] was our intended proposal for v1 of the file upload spec.  
>> I don't recall hearing any objection to publishing that as v1.
>>
>> Arun did not ever respond to that email thread, and your only  
>> comment was "This sounds like a great idea to me."
>>
> 1. Again, I apologize for embarking on a direction that wasn't what  
> Apple envisioned, but your intention to make [3] above a "v1" in  
> lieu of the a more expansive spec. wasn't clear to me.  Also, I  
> didn't respond to the thread because Jonas' post affirming that it  
> "... sounds like a great idea..." was sufficient.  Thus, I took the  
> proposal as a key component in a more expansive spec., but not as a  
> v1 spec. in and of itself.

Would you be against making it a v1 spec in and of itself?

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 11:00:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:28 GMT