W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:27:38 +0200
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ujdd0cnswxe0ny@widsith.orange-hotspot.com>

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:25:23 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>  

> * Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> Shouldn't there be an eventType so you can use document.createEvent to
>> make these? See http://www.w3.org/mid/48480B56.1050805@helsinki.fi
> This is unnecessary as the createEvent method takes an interface name
> as argument. Unfortunately Chaals seems to object to my advice to use
> the same format for the event and event interface definitions that is
> used in DOM Level 3 Events, otherwise it would include a note that you
> can use document.createEvent("ProgressEvent") to create an instance of
> them.

It does now. Issue closed.



> Namespace management for createEvent is presumably best handled in the
> specifications dealing with the Global object, which would probably be
> "Window Object", "WebIDL", "HTML5", and perhaps DOM Core; it certainly
> does not belong into DOM Level 3 Events.

Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 10:28:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:12 UTC