W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: [XHR2] Drop ByteArray?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:49:48 +0200
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uil89aqh64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:06:24 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:
> I will ask the ECMAScript committee what the plans are. I think we could  
> just invent our own ByteArray or BinaryData interface, it would work  
> better integrated into the language, but ImageData as a custom type  
> works ok in practice.

Yeah, some collegues suggested it could indeed be as simple as  
CanvasPixelArray. Would be good to hear what the ECMAScript guys think.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 6 October 2008 18:50:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:28 GMT