W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [access-control] Implementation comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:34:04 -0400
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uh91m2vc64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:53:32 -0400, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I agree we shouldn't prevent synthesized events. But why not say that no  
> ProgressEvents are dispatch at all?

That would prevent synthesized ProgressEvent events.


> Seems like you at least have to prevent 'abort' as well,

Why is that?


> so why not also 'loadstart' and 'error'.

We could do that I suppose. It would require doing an origin check before  
returning on send() in the asynchronous case, but that shouldn't be much  
of an issue.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 04:34:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:28 GMT