W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [access-control] Implementation comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:34:04 -0400
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uh91m2vc64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:53:32 -0400, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I agree we shouldn't prevent synthesized events. But why not say that no  
> ProgressEvents are dispatch at all?

That would prevent synthesized ProgressEvent events.

> Seems like you at least have to prevent 'abort' as well,

Why is that?

> so why not also 'loadstart' and 'error'.

We could do that I suppose. It would require doing an origin check before  
returning on send() in the asynchronous case, but that shouldn't be much  
of an issue.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 04:34:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:12 UTC