- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:35:28 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:26:05 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > However I think that if we are using URI syntax for these headers we > should treat them as URIs and not as opaque strings. Everywhere else > in the product URIs are parsed and canonicalized before being > compared. We specifically do not use string comparisons. I think for > the sake of consistency with the rest of the web platform we should do > the same here, anything else is just unexpected behavior. The point is actually that the header does _not_ take a URI. It did at some point, but you didn't like that. It takes the ASCII form of an origin instead, identically to The Web Socket Protocol in HTML 5. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 19:36:18 UTC