W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:29:44 +0200
Message-ID: <48ABE408.9080105@lachy.id.au>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> Of course not throwing on extra arguments is indeed the easy path to 
>> implementation (and is what Gecko will be shipping, it looks like), so 
>> as long as you can live with the results as a spec writer it's all 
>> good by me.
> 
> I think we should follow suite with all other functions in the DOM, 
> which means we should not throw for extra arguments. I see no reason to 
> treat this function differently than everything else.

OK, agreed. No exceptions for extra arguments.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 09:30:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:27 GMT