W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:39:48 -0700
Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <51254ACD-4E86-4FFB-B546-D6EC1D05CCC0@apple.com>
To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>

On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:

> Document interface is an interface. An interface does not have defined
> implementation; it is merely a contract. "IDL" is for "Interface
> Definition".
> The fact that some browsers expose Document as a global property does
> not need standardization. It would not be bad to have DOM readonly
> properties implemented with [[DontDelete]], [[ReadOnly]]. That could
> be one line in WebIDL, e.g.
> "DOM readonly properties have [[DontDelete]] and [[ReadOnly]]."
> But it seems fairly obvious that this would have to be so, so it
> wouldn't seem critical to include that.

All of the top four browser vendors would like to have these kinds of  
details clearly specified and to converge on interoperable behavior. I  
am not aware of any vendor that specifically wishes to diverge from  
interoperable behavior. As such, I hope the editor politely declines  
your requests to leave such things unspecified.

In general, leaving things unspecified does not prevent Web content  
from relying on them, it just hurts cross-browser interoperability and  
makes the lives of Web developers and browsers alike more painful. You  
have not presented any argument that outweighs such considerations.

Received on Friday, 15 August 2008 01:40:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:11 UTC