On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:03:19 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:32:18 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> >> wrote: >>> I would be in favor of Access-Control or Access-Control-Allow, I think >>> Access-Control-Origin and Origin are confusing in combination. It >>> seems unclear from the names which is a request header and which is a >>> response header. >> We could restrict Access-Control-* to the server. > > What would that win us? > > Naming all headers related to the spec Access-Control-* (as the spec > does now) seems to add clarity IMHO. It would make it clear to server authors which headers they are in control over without having to look at the header descriptions. I don't feel strongly about this though, adding Allow everywhere works for me too. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 05:30:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:00 GMT