- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:17:49 +0200
- To: "Sunava Dutta" <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:54:17 +0200, Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com> wrote: > I prefer > Access-control: * > Access-control: <URL> I suppose it would be slightly shorter, but it's also less clear. > In the future, denying a particular URL can be represented using the "-" > sign? > Access-control: -<URL> What is the use case for this? I'd like to keep the simple check simple and stable over time. New features can be added through headers, as we're doing with credentials, headers, and methods. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 22:18:21 UTC