W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

[Widgets] Requirements LC

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:04:53 +1000
Message-ID: <b21a10670806200004h50b6dc99s7d077f8a7a4b332d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>

To which Timeless replied...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>


(you didn't reply to the list)

On 6/18/08, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote:
>  R35. Configuration Document Data
>  A conforming specification SHOULD specify a means that allows authors
>  to access any relevant data they declared in the configuration

*relevant data*

>  document for the widget resource.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Marcos Caceres
<marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it was irrelevant, it would not have been declared in the config. I
> don't understand why you think it is irrelevant?

your words, not mine. I think you should just delete the word "relevant".

note that I'm reading everything *very* literally.

> Yes, that is possible (using XHR to load the config from within the
> package), but then you have to walk an XML tree which sucks. The other
> way is to use the properties that we have bound to the Widget object.
> Check out http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/Overview.src.html

yeah, i'm sure such things are possible in some theoretical sense, but
i want to make sure that the API you're asking for doesn't
specifically do/enable this.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 07:05:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:26 GMT