W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:48:10 +0000 (UTC)
To: Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, Web API public <public-webapi@w3.org>, IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team <ieajax@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0806190445020.13974@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Zhenbin Xu wrote:
> In the case there isn't clear technical differences, I don't think we 
> should pick the right solution based on implementer's cost. Rather We 
> should base it on customer impact. A bank with 6000 applications built 
> on top of IE's current APIs simply would not be happy if some 
> applications cannot run due to changes in some underlying object model. 
> And this is not IE's problem alone since the bank simply cannot upgrade 
> or change the browser, if all other browsers result in the same 
> breakage.

For non-Web HTML pages like in this example, solutions like IE's "IE7 
mode" are fine. IMHO we should be concentrating on pages on the Web, not 
on browser-specific pages -- interoperability isn't relevant when the 
page isn't intended to run on multiple browsers.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2008 04:48:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:10 UTC