Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]

Additionally, this WG is chartered to do all technical discussions on 
the public list. I would therefore request that if this document is of 
technical nature, that it be sent to the public list.

Best Regards,
Jonas Sicking

Rigo Wenning wrote:
> Dear all, 
> 
> I've looked at the click-through license of the Microsoft Public 
> License. The license has some viral effects and if the specification 
> you are producing here will re-use parts of Microsoft's document, we 
> may end up in a situation where the Recommendation would also have to 
> carry the MS-Public license because of the click-through. 
> 
> I would rather like to avoid such a confusing situation. So if this 
> document is not only for reading, I would kindly ask Microsoft to 
> provide the document either in member space or in public space as a 
> contribution within the framework of the work of this group. This 
> would allow all to work in the context they expect. The contribution 
> can be done by sending the document to the mailing-list or adding it 
> to the wiki with a comment that it is designated to be input and 
> contribution to the WebAPI work.
> 
> Would that be feasible? I think that was what Art requested in the 
> message cited below.
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Rigo Wenning
> W3C Staff counsel
> 
> Art Barstow wrote:
>> Sunava - as requested by several members of the WG, please send a 
> PDF
>> version of this document directly to the public-webapps mail list.
>>
>> -Thanks, Art Barstow
>