W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > March 2013

RfR: WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 25

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:59:51 -0400
Message-ID: <513E37B7.2070701@nokia.com>
To: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
This is a call for review for the WebSocket API test files from Opera:

<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/>

Note: some of these files were included in an earlier RfR [1]. Below, 
James identifies those files that were in [1] but have since changed.

Note: the *-1.html files in the unload-a-document directory are "helper" 
files (that are not directly run).

If you have any comments, please send them to 
public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org by March 25.

If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that 
as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone 
reviewed the tests).

In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved 
by the WG.

-Thanks, AB

[1] 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-testsuite/2013Feb/0025.html>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: RfR: 32 WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 7
Resent-Date: 	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:37:39 +0000
Resent-From: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Date: 	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:37:06 +0100
From: 	ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
To: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>



On 03/11/2013 02:17 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> James, Simon - presumably the test files for the RfR that ended March 7
> are now reviewed and considered approved unless any of them were changed
> during the RfR period. If any of those files were changed during the
> review, please let us which ones.

if my hg-fu worked the files that changed from the set in the previous
RfR are:

WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/002.html
WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/004.html
WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/008.html
WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/opening-handshake/002.html

> Also, would you please clarify the set of additional files that need
> review? It appears to me the files _not_ yet reviewed are:
>
> * 2 files in
><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/
>  - just 013.html and 014.html
>
> * 7 files in
><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/cookies/
>
> * 72 files in the subdirs of
><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/interfaces/>
>
>
> * 5 - 8 files in
><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/unload-a-document/>
> - should all of these files be reviewed (the use of "dash-1" in the
> filenames is `different` so just want to make sure).

The -1 files are "helper" files i.e. they are part of the test but not
the main url that gets loaded.

> After the set of files that need are clarified, I'll start a new RfR.

Your list sounds right. In essence everything under
WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/ is ready for review.
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 20:00:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC