W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > March 2013

Re: RfR: 32 WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 7

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:17:31 -0400
Message-ID: <513DD96B.5010605@nokia.com>
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
CC: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
James, Simon - presumably the test files for the RfR that ended March 7 
are now reviewed and considered approved unless any of them were changed 
during the RfR period. If any of those files were changed during the 
review, please let us which ones.

Also, would you please clarify the set of additional files that need 
review? It appears to me the files _not_ yet reviewed are:

* 2 files in 
<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/ 
- just 013.html and 014.html

* 7 files in 
<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/cookies/

* 72 files in the subdirs of 
<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/interfaces/>

* 5 - 8 files in 
<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/unload-a-document/> 
- should all of these files be reviewed (the use of "dash-1" in the 
filenames is `different` so just want to make sure).

After the set of files that need are clarified, I'll start a new RfR.

-Thanks, AB


On 2/28/13 7:48 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
> This is a call for review for 32 WebSocket API test files from Opera:
>
> * 4 files in 
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/>
>
> * 3 files in 
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/closing-handshake/>
>
> * 18 files in 
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/> 
> but NOT test files 13 and 14
>
> * 1 file in 
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/keeping-connection-open/>
>
> * 4 files in 
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/opening-handshake/>
>
> * 2 files in 
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/security/>
>
> If you have any comments, please send them to 
> public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org by March 7.
>
> If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state 
> that as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not 
> anyone reviewed the tests).
>
> In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered 
> Approved by the WG.
>
> [FWIW, I just ran the above tests on Chrome ( 25.0.1364.99) and all 
> passed but: constructor tests 2(8P/2F), 10, 11, 16, 18 and 
> opening-handshake 5 (although test file 2 has some type of format 
> error).]
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     Re: [websocket-test] What's the plan for reviewing and 
> approving Opera's WebSocket tests?
> Resent-Date:     Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:44:41 +0000
> Resent-From:     <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
> Date:     Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:44:11 +0100
> From:     ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
> To:     <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
>
>
>
> On 02/27/2013 09:53 AM, James Graham wrote:
>
>> For my part I have restarted work on fixing up the Opera submissions. I
>> can't promise a timescale for completing the work because it isn't part
>> of my day job.
>
> I have made a start on this; I believe the tests in the following
> directories are now ready for review:
>
> /WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary
>
> /WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/closing-handshake
>
> /WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor (except 013.html and
> 014.html)
>
> /WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/keeping-connection-open/
>
> /WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/opening-handshake/
>
> /WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/security/
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 13:18:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC