Re: Adding WebSocket and WebWorker test suites to testing framework

On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:17:42 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:

> On 11/7/12 7:45 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:29:18 +0100, Arthur Barstow  
>> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/6/12 12:33 PM, ext Kris Krueger wrote:
>>>> Simon do you actually have to convert all the tests?
>>>> If all the browsers pass then it would seem best to no spend time  
>>>> converting these 'Opera' tests.
>>>> Since we'll delaying the spec from moving from CR -> PR waiting for  
>>>> this work to be completed.
>>>
>>> I'd rather not wait a "few months" to start the CR interop testing.
>>
>> Then don't.
>>
>>> Can someone identify the gap(s) Opera's tests fill and just port those  
>>> tests for now and port the others post PR? If we go that route, when  
>>> can that (presumably) smaller porting effort be completed?
>>
>> This seems more effort than just converting all remaining tests. I  
>> suggest we continue the work with converting the tests on the basis of  
>> available time of those who volunteer to do the work, and take the  
>> tests that have been converted when you want to "start testing".
>
> Thanks Simon; that sounds reasonable to me.
>
> Kris - as the TC for WebSocket, I'll assume you will start a new RfR for  
> the additional tests when ready.

(I meant to reply to http://www.w3.org/mid/512F18DB.3010503@opera.com but  
I didn't have it in my inbox.)

James and I have now finished converting all the Opera WebSocket tests.  
Review welcome.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 12:52:14 UTC