- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:38:56 -0500
- To: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>, public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org, "Ms2ger @ Mozilla" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
On 1/18/13 7:57 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to volunteer as a test facilitator for Progress Events > spec. Excellent and thanks (I updated PubStatus accordingly). > I just submitted three test cases: > > For 4.1 Firing events using the ProgressEvent interface for HTTP, > [ProgressEvents]/tests/submissions/Samsung/firing-events-http-content-length.html > [ProgressEvents]/tests/submissions/Samsung/firing-events-http-no-content-length.html > > For 4.4 Security Considerations, > [ProgressEvents]/tests/submissions/Samsung/security-consideration.html > > They somehow seem to be taken care of in more detail by the > specifications implementing Progress Events such as XHR, but I've > tried to extend the coverage to the entire sections. > > I believe the test cases that Ms2ger has contributed and the three > above together cover all the assertions in the spec. OK (and if anyone disagrees with that assessment, please speak up). > Can we call RfR for the test cases? > ..../submissions/Ms2ger > ..../submissions/Samsung Yes I can start a RfR but first, a few questions ... * What is the implementation status of the CR? * Ms2ger - are your PE tests ready for review? * Is one week review time sufficient? Lastly, rather doing a review within WebApps' testing group followed by a WG-wide review, I would like to just have a single WG-wide review. If anyone objects to that, please let me know. -Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 13:39:28 UTC