W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Adding WebSocket and WebWorker test suites to testing framework

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:17:42 -0500
Message-ID: <509D1086.5080602@nokia.com>
To: ext Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, ext Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
On 11/7/12 7:45 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:29:18 +0100, Arthur Barstow 
> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/6/12 12:33 PM, ext Kris Krueger wrote:
>>> Simon do you actually have to convert all the tests?
>>> If all the browsers pass then it would seem best to no spend time 
>>> converting these 'Opera' tests.
>>> Since we'll delaying the spec from moving from CR -> PR waiting for 
>>> this work to be completed.
>>
>> I'd rather not wait a "few months" to start the CR interop testing.
>
> Then don't.
>
>> Can someone identify the gap(s) Opera's tests fill and just port 
>> those tests for now and port the others post PR? If we go that route, 
>> when can that (presumably) smaller porting effort be completed?
>
> This seems more effort than just converting all remaining tests. I 
> suggest we continue the work with converting the tests on the basis of 
> available time of those who volunteer to do the work, and take the 
> tests that have been converted when you want to "start testing".

Thanks Simon; that sounds reasonable to me.

Kris - as the TC for WebSocket, I'll assume you will start a new RfR for 
the additional tests when ready.

-AB
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 14:18:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC