W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > March 2012

RE: Path for testharness resources [Was: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission]

From: 유성옥 <sungok.you@infraware.co.kr>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:26:06 +0900
Message-ID: <932C9F349DF6A64385F50954E1964FEA040E85FD@TOMAS.infraware.co.kr>
To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, 김성택 <stkim@infraware.co.kr>, 이종흔 <jhlee@infraware.co.kr>
Re-sending for archival purposes...

-----Original Message-----
From: 유성옥 
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:00 AM
To: 'Arthur Barstow'
Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org; 김성택; 이종흔
Subject: RE: Path for testharness resources [Was: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission]

Hi AB.
The test is to check QuotaExceededError.(http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/#dom-storage-setitem)
It looks like "no responds" with Chrome. However it will be pass after waiting. 
It is for exception handling when errors occur. So it is slow a little.
It can be an obstacle for automatic test. 
If  you think the test is not important, how about excluding the test from the test suite? Please let me know your opinion. 

I'd like you to designate Jong-Heun Lee(Infraware) as the Test Facilitator.

Thank you for the comments. 


BR,
Sung-Ok You.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:27 PM
To: 유성옥
Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org; 김성택; 이종흔
Subject: Re: Path for testharness resources [Was: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission]

On 2/17/12 12:08 AM, ext 유성옥 wrote:
> Hi, All
> We have changed the path to the testharness.
> Please check it. :)
>
> <script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
> <script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>

Good (and Msg2ger and I updated the Harness wiki to reflect the above 
resources (and paths).

> If you have any comment for the test cases, please let me know. :)

I ran the tests on Chrome (17.0.963.56) and all of them reported Pass 
except the following test resulted in a Kill Window / Wait dialog:

     
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/storage_local_setitem_quotaexceedederr.html


Do you know what's going on with this test?

After we get a common understanding of this test, perhaps I should start 
a Request for Review for all of these tests.

BTW, are you or one of your Infraware colleagues willing to be 
designated as the Test Facilitator for the Web Storage test suite?

-AB
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 00:26:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 March 2012 00:26:56 GMT