W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > March 2012

RfR: Web Storage tests; deadline March 15

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:10:21 -0500
Message-ID: <4F58CBDD.2070004@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
Jong Heun has fixed the issues Alex raised so let's extend the review 
another week (March 15). If you review the tests, please report your 
findings.

I am also interested in whether or not you consider this test suite 
sufficient to test conformance of the Candidate Recommendation and if 
not, what are the issues.

-Thanks, AB

On 3/6/12 3:45 AM, ext 이종흔 wrote:
> Hi, all
> I have fixed the problems regarding initStorageEvent&  attachEvent.
> Thank you for comments. :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:53 AM
> To: ext Alex Kuang; 이종흔
> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Web Storage tests; deadline March 6
>
> Thanks for the review Alex!
>
> Jong Heun - I would appreciate it, if you would please fix the problems that Alex identified and notify this list.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
> On 3/5/12 2:00 PM, ext Alex Kuang wrote:
>> I've reviewed the tests and found out that initStorageEvent API is used in the below 4 tests:
>> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve
>> nt_local_constructor.html
>> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve
>> nt_session_constructor.html
>> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve
>> nt_local_storageeventinit.html
>> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve
>> nt_session_storageeventinit.html
>>
>> "initStorageEvent" appears in the old spec (and it takes 8 parameters):
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110901/
>>
>> However, it is removed from the current spec and Event constructor is recommend:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/
>>
>> Also, the tests check for existence of attachEvent API which is not standard compliant.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:11 AM
>> To: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
>> Subject: RfR: Web Storage tests; deadline March 6
>>
>> This is a Request for Review [RfR] for all of the tests Infraware submitted for the Web Storage spec:
>>
>>
>> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/
>>
>> If you have any comments, please send them by March 6.
>>
>> If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone reviewed the tests).
>>
>> In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved.
>>
>> -AB
>>
>> [RfR] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Approval
>>
>>
>>
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 15:10:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC