W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [workers] Seeking status and plan for test suite

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:30:22 +0200
To: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: ms2ger@gmail.com
Message-ID: <op.wgfyswxsidj3kv@simons-macbook-pro.local>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:33:33 +0200, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:

> Hi Simon, All - what is the status and next step(s) for the Workers test  
> suite <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/Workers/tests/>?

As we said when we submitted it, it needs to be rewritten to use  
testharness.js. Ms2ger has said he could help with this.

http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120529#l-356
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120529#l-417

> Do you consider it sufficient to test CR conformance? If not, what needs  
> to be done?

I don't know what's necessary to test CR conformance. I would say it has  
pretty good coverage, although interaction with application cache is not  
well tested. Some things may be out of date or wrong -- for instance I  
just found that  
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/Workers/tests/submissions/Opera/semantics/interface-objects/001.html  
should remove "Database" and add a few others -- so would benefit from  
review (maybe after being rewritten).

HTH
-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 04:30:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC