W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Fwd: [testsuites] WebSocket support on w3c-test.org

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:43:40 -0500
Message-ID: <4F4D043C.9090206@nokia.com>
To: "ext Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
On 2/27/12 11:26 PM, ext Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> Hi Art,
>
> I wasn't actually proposing anything. I certainly didn't mean to suggest we
> should restrict everybody to only writing WebSocket server pieces in
> Python. My purpose was just to let everybody know that it's now possible to
> write WebSocket server parts in Python and run them on w3c-test.org.  And
> now that we have Jetty set up, it's also possible write tests in Java and
> run them there too.
>
> As I said in the other message I just now sent to you and Kris, I think we
> can support multiple formats on the server side -- within reason of course.
> I don't want to end up installing some obscure system just because somebody
> prefers to write tests using it. But I know already that multiple browser
> projects are using pywebsocket for testing internally, and I know that
> Jetty in general is widely used too, so it's worthwhile to have Jetty
> available as well for anybody who wants to use it.

Thanks for the clarification Mike (it seems reasonable to me to support 
more than one format for the server).

-AB

>   --Mike
>
> Arthur Barstow<art.barstow@nokia.com>, 2012-02-27 14:12 -0500:
>
>> [I just realized this email did not go to WebApps' testsuite list]
>>
>> Mike, Kris, All - how does Mike's proposal below compare to the proposal
>> Kris made last week:
>>
>>      http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-testsuite/2012Feb/0014.html
>>
>>
>> -Thanks, Art
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:44:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC