W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Seeking status of the WebSocket API test suite

From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:08:48 +0000
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, "Ms2ger @ Mozilla" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
CC: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0A605FCDA3A4DC45A98B0DDD1C5351A703564AEF@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Microsoft can help - we have been evaluating some servers to make sure it can 'put arbitrary bits on the wire'.
Which I think is really the current blocker for moving forward.

-Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 5:53 AM
To: ext James Graham; Kris Krueger; Ms2ger @ Mozilla
Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org; Philippe Le Hégaret
Subject: Re: Seeking status of the WebSocket API test suite

Is someone willing to take the lead on the WebSocket API test suite? I see that Microsoft and Ms2ger have made submissions <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/>.

If there are some "infrastructure" issues, what are those issues?

-Thanks, AB

On 12/9/11 2:48 AM, ext James Graham wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Kris Krueger wrote:
>
>> Everyone should be delighted that the webApps webSockets spec has 
>> moved to the CR stage.
>>
>> I believe that with a proposal sent to the list and some w3c systems 
>> assistance we can reach consensus on how to test webSockets.
>> I'll take an action item to send a proposal to the list so that we 
>> can reach consensus.
>>
>> James please note the below post to the list - 
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1406.ht
>> ml
>
> Ah, yes, now you point me to it I remember reading that message :)
>
> Has there ben any progress with the systems team? What is the nature 
> of the server-side component? Does it meet the requirement to be able 
> to put arbitary bits on the wire?
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:09:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:09:31 GMT