Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Rewriting abstract (#1494)

@jungkees 

> It seems to me that the first paragraph of the change seems a bit too specific in using terms. 

Hmm, I was trying to describe what the service worker is before things like the fetch event are added on top, and why it's used for particular event rather than just firing events in . a document.

Eg, I could remove some of the terms & make it:

The core of this specification is a worker that wakes to receive events. This provides an event destination that can be used when other destinations would be inappropriate, or no other destination exists.

Is that better?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1494#issuecomment-571089428