Re: [w3c/editing] update charter (#215)

marcoscaceres commented on this pull request.



> +- allow a network of experts to share information about gaps and requirements for building editing frameworks on the web.  
+
+The specifications the Editing Taskforce is producing may be driven to the spec level directly by its members within the Web Applications Working Group, or be transferred to another, more appropriate working group after initial collection of requirements. Furthermore, the group defines its success as when it at the very least, produces a recommendation with well defined requirements that result in enhancing existing text editing related specification drafts or helps design new ones.
+
+The TF is expected to work on the following efforts until the end of the charter but it is not meant to be an exhaustive list:
+
+- [Async Clipboard API](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=931839) 
+- [ContentEditableDisabled](http://w3c.github.io/editing/contentEditableDisabled.html) - ability to disable system UI 
+- [EditContext API](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/master/EditContext/explainer.md) 
+- [Highlight API](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/master/highlight/explainer.md) 
+- Native Selection and Caret behaviors 
+- [SpellChecker API](https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/166) 
+- [SIP Policy](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4876) 
+- [Input Events](https://www.w3.org/TR/input-events-1/) 
+- [ContentEditable](https://w3c.github.io/contentEditable/) 
+

All we need to do is set `"specStatus": "unofficial"` in the ReSpec config. Same thing we did with `execCommand`. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/215#discussion_r340409393