[w3c/screen-orientation] Should the -secondary orientations be exposed? (#188) from Simon Fraser on 2019-10-18 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from October 2019)

From: Simon Fraser <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 16:02:34 -0700
To: w3c/screen-orientation <screen-orientation@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/screen-orientation/issues/188@github.com>

Are there any use cases for locking to the upside-down (portrait-secondary, landscape-secondary) orientations? Generally people would only care about landscape and portrait, and would want the device to choose the closest one to rotate to.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues/188

Received on Friday, 18 October 2019 23:02:36 UTC