Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: require returned dictionary members (#185)

Less rigorous feedback: For output-only dictionaries it would appear on every member, which seems to just add noise. For dictionaries that are used for both input and output (are there any?), `required` can't be present on optional input members even if the output member will always be present; do we then split the dictionary definitions just to capture this correctly? Maybe output dictionaries should be their own IDL type anyway?

(Not a strong objection from me, though.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/185#issuecomment-540674859