Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Change 'CSS Modules' name to avoid webdev confusion (#843)

Yeah but the ECMAScript standard describes them as "modules" (no script). I realize its a different spec but my main point is this: 

"Scripts" makes sense if what we're importing is actually a script. But we're talking about css here, right? I admit that I'm not too familiar with the reasoning behind why we've decided to use "script" for everything, but it seems weird to call the css that we're importing into a file a "module _script_".

I may be derailing from the conversation though so I'll just wait to hear if others want to chime in. But I just don't feel comfortable voting on something that I think will just add to the confusion 😄. Whatever you all decide, we'll all just have to deal with and adjust I guess. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/843#issuecomment-537302007