Re: [heycam/webidl] Pattern for defining constructors, methods, getters, and setters (#730)

@marcoscaceres without any kind of qualifier for steps? It'd be even more of a change from the status quo and it might be a little harder to tell which constructor, but we could do that I suppose. I don't care strongly.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/730#issuecomment-558084742