Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HTMLVideoElement.requestAnimationFrame() (#429)

I think one thing that's worth considering here is whether modeling this after `Window.requestAnimationFrame` is the right choice.  That's a relatively old API that I think isn't looked at all that favorably these days, and there may be better alternatives.  That said, it's possible it's the right thing here.  (For example, it seems like it might be desirable here to skip frames under high load... and using this API *might* lead to that happening?)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/429#issuecomment-555775209