Re: [w3c/editing] update charter (#215)

marcoscaceres commented on this pull request.



> +
+- [Async Clipboard API](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=931839) 
+- [ContentEditableDisabled](http://w3c.github.io/editing/contentEditableDisabled.html) - ability to disable system UI 
+- [EditContext API](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/master/EditContext/explainer.md) 
+- [Highlight API](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/master/highlight/explainer.md) 
+- Native Selection and Caret behaviors 
+- [SpellChecker API](https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/166) 
+- [SIP Policy](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4876) 
+- [Input Events](https://www.w3.org/TR/input-events-1/) 
+- [ContentEditable](https://w3c.github.io/contentEditable/) 
+
+Deliverables are expected to eventually be shipped as standards recommendation by the Web Applications Working Group, CSS Working Group or any other group where a draft specification may fall into.
+
+### 3. Participation
+
+This task force is designed to make participation relatively easy for people not currently involved in the standards process (typically, developers of editing tool libraries) who may not be amenable to signing up to a large in scope discussions that can be found in, for instance, the main Web Applications Working Group.

> by the way, how do people become Invited Experts?

It's pretty easy: the Editor's nominate them to the Chairs/Team (team-webapps@w3.org). Then they just fill out a form. 
https://www.w3.org/participate/invited-experts/

It's a quick process. 

> That said, do people need to go through the process if they just wanted to dial-in or leave comments/open issues in github?

Generally no... but it depends on what kind of contribution they are making. If they are adding something that is significant/substantive ("let's add a feature X! it would work like this: ..." or "browser behavior should follow this model: ...") then yes, they MUST become an Invited Expert - what you need to be on the lookout for is for someone claiming "this was my idea!" (because they could have a patent on it). 

If they are just fixing typos, examples, etc. then the do not need to be an Invited Expert. If unsure, ask the Chairs - and be overly cautions. 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/215#discussion_r342334466