Re: [w3c/editing] update charter (#215)

gked commented on this pull request.



> +- [ContentEditable](https://w3c.github.io/contentEditable/) 
+
+Deliverables are expected to eventually be shipped as standards recommendation by the Web Applications Working Group, CSS Working Group or any other group where a draft specification may fall into.
+
+### 3. Participation
+
+This task force is designed to make participation relatively easy for people not currently involved in the standards process (typically, developers of editing tool libraries) who may not be amenable to signing up to a large in scope discussions that can be found in, for instance, the main Web Applications Working Group.
+
+The group encourages questions, comments and all technical discussions on its public [mailing list](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-editing-tf/) and [document repositories](https://github.com/w3c/editing).
+
+Participants are reminded of the  [W3C's Code of Ethical Conduct](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/).
+
+ 
+### 4. Decision Policy
+
+Editing Task Force group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus. In cases where there is a need to formally produce a group resolution about a particular issue, its chair(s) will put a question about the issue to the group and gather responses (including any formal objections to formally publishing a document into the appropriate WG); then, after due consideration of all the responses, the Chair(s) will record a group resolution (possibly after a formal vote and also along with responding to any formal objections). 

Just to clarify this section. These decisions are not about whether something should become a spec draft but rather a shape of a proposal or a specific approach before we propose it to the appropriate WG.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/215#discussion_r342328438