Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Add a missing ref-name for requestPointerLock method (#48)

Fair enough. So let's follow the pattern here then. I removed my changes and also change the new reference to {{}} as from what you said it seems that will get more support and seems to be the recommended way of referencing here.
I'll follow what you suggested here in the following patches that I will send for adding new params.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/48#issuecomment-511634345

Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2019 02:01:20 UTC