Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request's associated element (#912)

@hiroshige-g the process split makes sense and I think other implementations are moving in similar directions. However, I think it's okay for Fetch to cover both sides. Before we go "in parallel" we have access to state like this, after we go "in parallel" such state is no longer present.

(Ideally CSS uses a similar image loading code path. I'm pretty sure it does in implementations, but the CSS specifications are not updated with this kind of information.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/912#issuecomment-510093790

Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2019 14:49:16 UTC