Re: [whatwg/streams] Switching to Web IDL (#963)

> One thing I'm very concerned about is not making implementers feel like we are creating busywork for them. Or that for those implementers like @tschneidereit who implement streams in the JS engine, they now need to uproot all their work and move it to their rendering engine.

If this actually happens to be the case, I'm very strongly opposed to this change, for what should be obvious reasons. Moving our implementation out of the JS engine is entirely a non-starter, as it would mean starting from scratch.

That said, I do agree WebIDL would otherwise have advantages, so I'll try to figure out a way to keep our implementation while moving to WebIDL. Will update here once I know more.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/963#issuecomment-439412965