Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Migrating some high-entropy HTTP request headers to Client Hints. (#320)

I've updated both the `UA-*` and `Lang` proposals to send `Sec-CH-*` headers (in https://github.com/mikewest/ua-client-hints/commit/f3570bfcbe38a422b1cb94d59a241040e23e675c and https://github.com/mikewest/lang-client-hint/commit/f32ef12c9674b4cd1e0224751bafd78b89c2c9f2), and I filed https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/716 for @yoavweiss to follow up on whether this prefix makes sense for hints generally. It seems like it might!

But it also seems somewhat tangential to the question I'd like to discuss here: infrastructure to the side, are _these_ hints good ideas? Or should we address `User-Agent` and `Accept-Language` differently?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/320#issuecomment-436194748