Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept headers in spec cause confusion (#274)

Hmmm @yoavweiss not certain i'm versed well enough in this ecosystem to even give feedback. Still fairly new here. I do realize we push back on things [conneg-y](https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg). However I feel much of the pain (and failure) in the past was much to do with conversations like this **not** being had (or being had behind respective vendor closed doors). Much has changed since then and specs (usually) are sound. It's the assumption during implementation is the loading of the magazine in said footgun IMHO.

Perhaps this is less of a deal than I think this is. You all would know better. However during this transition to a more collaborative web I'm learning (from @domenic) "That's just the way we've done things around here." Is ok to question from time to time.

Is this even a concern @yoavweiss or are there better fish to fry?

Thanks for the feedback and your time.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/274#issuecomment-373432241