Re: [whatwg/dom] Candidates for AbstractRange (#591)

> We could have an impl of StaticRange that basically saves values from the ctor and that's it.

I was thinking that since a subclass has to be able to alter those fields, you have some limitations there.

Anyway, I'm happy to not support mutation.

For your last paragraph, the problem with those is that we then need to add validation for the static range case. Perhaps reasonable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/591#issuecomment-372901431