- From: Russell Bicknell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 05:02:36 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2018 05:03:43 UTC
Sorry, I didn't see your comment before sending mine. > That's not the motivation. The motivation here is to offer feature parity with built-in elements to custom elements. If this is only about providing feature parity and not about performance but (2) is equivalent, then isn't the feature purely redundant? Why include it in the spec? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/468#issuecomment-371379702
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2018 05:03:43 UTC