Re: [heycam/webidl] Add the symbol type (#377)

Yeah, it looks like an oversight.

The idea was to add actual syntax for them in support of https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/469. But, that PR is stalled on implementer interest, so this hasn't seen any real use in the wild. As you can see from the above, we mostly merged it because it fixed #301.

Do you think we should fix up the oversights and add union and overload processing for symbols, or walk things back and remove the parts of this patch that aren't necessary for solving #301?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/377#issuecomment-371055294