Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow used body replacement in Request constructor (#675)

> I wonder if we should move step 7.1 down to the other body checks

Actually, is the check in 7.1 even necessary? The logical place for it is to add it to the beginning of step 43's substeps, but it seems like it's already implicit in step 43.1 -- piping to `rs`.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/675#issuecomment-369749564

Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 22:14:43 UTC