Re: [heycam/webidl] More convenient way to refer to / use "map iterators" (#324)

I'd be fine with that; I'm only talking about the return type *because* of symmetry with `sequence<>`.  In any case, we can always start with the one that has justification and add the rest later.

Hm, does anyone *besides* map return the equivalent of a pair-sequence?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/324#issuecomment-362110276