Re: [whatwg/fetch] keepalive: Do we need to restrict the number of requests at a time? (#662) from Ilya Grigorik on 2018-01-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2018)

From: Ilya Grigorik <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/662/360494140@github.com>

@sleevi thanks, I think we're on the same page with respect to motivation + tension. 

> @igrigorik We (Chrome) already have 30-sec timeout. It's implemented in multiple places for some reasons, but see content::KeepAliveHandleFactory for example. We also have a restriction on the number of requests in a way in content::ResourceDispatcherHostImpl::HasSufficientResourcesForRequest.

@sleevi given the above, what's the implementation delta (if any) between what you're asking for and what's implemented in Chrome. Or, is the remaining AI here on spec side to document these mechanisms?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/662#issuecomment-360494140

Received on Thursday, 25 January 2018 15:09:37 UTC