Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Soft Update seems way to aggressive (#1250)

>Just to clarify, the problem you're referring to is Chrome caching the SW script as per HTTP rules (with a max-age cap of 1 day), right?

Yep.

>I guess we underestimated how many developers don't have control over their caching headers

I think this is right.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1250#issuecomment-358285741

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:10:12 UTC